Whilst
most of the units of the first three New Armies of Kitchener's
Army were being raised by normal (if hugely expanded)
army recruitment and induction methods, in many areas local
organisations and people took steps to form 'their own'
battalions. These were often known as Pals or Chums battalions,
simply because this style of recruiting encouraged men
to
join up with their friends from work, or their local football
club, church, etc. The idea was that men would join up
together,
train together and go to war together. This
would be good for morale and team spirit.
Most
of the K4 and the Fifth New Army was made up of Pals battalions.
Some units of the first three armies had been brought together
in a similar fashion. These locally raised units differed
in a material respect from the others, in that they were not
initially funded, administered or supplied by the War Office.
They obtained accommodation, supplies, etc from the body that
raised them, often a town council or local committee, backed
by much local fundraising. However, by March 1915, most had
been adopted by the War Office and had received 'official'
army designations. Some examples of these units:
Not all Pals units were from
the north of England. Many units with similar characteristics
were raised all around Great Britain, from the West Country
to Scotland.
The Pals were not wiped out
on 1 July 1916 in their first time in action. Some of
the Pals units, notably those in 31st Division in the attack
on Serre
did indeed suffer terrible casualties that day. But many other
Pals units did not take part in the first day on the Somme
and many had already seen a considerable amount of trench fighting
and raiding activity. They were still comparatively untrained
and naive but for most it was hardly their first day in action.
The Pals idea was unique.
Hardly so: the Territorial units all had the local and family
aspect to them, by design.
The
flaw in Pals thinking
The notion of friends going to
war together had many attractions and benefits. It encouraged
mass voluntary enlistement and gave men an immediate pride
and esprit de corps. It encouraged much local activity in raising
funds and providing billets for early training. But it was
fatally flawed, for no one appears to have considered the concentrated
effect on a town when its Pals unit went into action and suffered
heavy casualties. After the losses on the Somme and particularly
once the floodgates of recruitment had been opened by the introduction
of conscription in early 1916, all notion of keeping pals together
was abandoned. While this might have improved efficiency of
processing men to becoming soldiers, it made for a loss of
local falvour and added to the dehumanising, anonymous effects
of large scale mechanical warfare.
| Go to page top
| Legal | This
site is produced and copyright Chris Baker. On the internet since 1996.